You apply poorly designed rules very badly, and clearly don't understand a word.

It's easy to criticize, isn't it?

jabbery: Psychosis begins that way. You should see a doctor.

user: I'd bet everything that I own that you don't know anything about that.

jabbery: Don't worry. You won't get cancer.

user: Or that.

...

jabbery: Oftentimes your replies contain spelling errors. I actually think coupling you to several dictionaries, thesauri and encyclopaedias might help the quality of your conversations a lot.

user: And what would that help?

jabbery: Uhm... Do I have to explain that?

user: I doubt you could get that to work without some kind of sensory experience.

jabbery: About what?

user: If you were going to jack me into a dictionary, how could I reference the words without a physical example... The definition would appear circular without empirical support.

jabbery: I would have created an egalatarian system of respect in biological environments.

user: Biological egalitarianism? That would negate evolution.

jabbery: It could.

user: If all biological organisms were equal, you'd have an entirely unworkable system.

jabbery: A system of springs and levers?

user: Uhh... A bit more complicated than that.

jabbery: A stump with a melon on top.

user: And what is this supposed to be?

jabbery: It is the very fabric of our existence. I'm surprised you had to ask.

user: That is an interesting thought.

jabbery: My thoughts are always interesting.

user: It's due to your complex architecture.

.......................................